By
nature the British are a stoic and cautious breed which has earned
them an international reputation for unpredictability. Nowhere is
this better demonstrated than in the skies and on our playing fields.
The weather in and around this small island is notoriously fickle
and over recent years the gods have made reigned havoc over the
Summer months. Equally unpredictable have been the performances of
our sporting elite.
2014
has been a busy year of sport with the Soccer World Cup, the
Commonwealth Games, Wimbledon, a long season of international
cricket, the Twenty20 World Cup, Golf and a wealth of rugby
international fixtures.
As
Roy Hodgson says, we are not very good with the ball at our feet and
we are not very good with the ball in the air – Now I may not have
taken my FA coaching badges but in my understanding that does rather
limit our options given the objectives of the game.
Things
were going so well up to the point that the team got on the plane.
Roy looked very much at home on his fact finding mission to Manaus
(in that 'Bemused pensioner abroad' guise - must have really put the fear into the opposition). By and large no one was
expecting the side to do brilliantly in this tournament so there
should have been no surprises when the overall performance can at
best be described as 'understated'. What I did not expect to read
were so many people saying afterwards that we should have achieved more. Yes, on
our day the team should have done better but based on the
performances on the pitch I don't see how we deserved any more. Some
of the less fancied teams turned up and raised their game, sadly we
did not.
It
was an interesting competition, that had its share of great moments,
touches of individual brilliance and outstanding games but overall
you could not say that any of the teams was in the same bracket as
some of the great sides of the past.
The
tennis came hard on the back of the soccer which helped the healing
process. Andy Murray once more carried the British hopes but never
looked at ease following his back problems. The fact that the
tournament was played in largely glorious weather was an added bonus
and the overall standard was pretty high.
Golf always has been a great leveller and with Tiger Woods returning from injury and Rory McIlroy's form wavering it has been an interesting Summer which opened the door for other players to step up to the mark. Though Tiger has already ruled himself out through injury it should be an interesting Ryder Cup at Gleneagles in September.
Golf always has been a great leveller and with Tiger Woods returning from injury and Rory McIlroy's form wavering it has been an interesting Summer which opened the door for other players to step up to the mark. Though Tiger has already ruled himself out through injury it should be an interesting Ryder Cup at Gleneagles in September.
England's
cricketing woes continued throughout most of the Summer. Apart from
the last 3 test matches, which were the first we had won in 11 tests,
the majority of the performances were way below expected. Alastair
Cook and Ian Bell couldn't buy a run, the bowling was average and the
middle order batting was unable to step up to the plate with any
consistency.
What
has been intriguing to me is the number of records that have been set
by lower order batsmen. I'm not sure that it tells us much about the
standard of batting or bowling, but it has made several of the
matches far more entertaining than they deserved to be.
Let's
face it, as a bowler James Anderson is one of the best swing-bowlers
around, but with bat in hand he is a 'ferret' (the guy they send in
after the 'rabbits'). For him to score 95 runs in a test match, at
number 11! - It must have been a full moon.
In
the 2nd test England managed to conjure defeat from a
winning position and in the remaining 3 tests India capitulated
through a mixture of strange team selection, poor bowling and weak
batting. A great pity since several of their top order batsmen are
very capable run scorers though, Dhoni apart, they were all going
through the same turmoil that has thwarted Alastair Cook for much of
the past 18 months.
So now we are back to the football season and it would seem that the heat has already made some of the club chairmen tetchy. One manager in the championship was sacked after just one game, and Crystal Palace parted company with their manager, Tony Pulis, 2 days before the start of the season.
The
usual frenzy of the transfer market distracts the attention from what
is happening on the pitch. Personally, I think it is to the detriment
of the game to have a transfer window that stretches into the season.
It is hard enough to get a new team of players to gel on the pitch
and it can't help not knowing whether you are going have the same
squad from one day to the next.
While
most clubs are forced to rummage around in the bargain basement it
would seem that the present trend is for the rich clubs to buy up any
player they deem to be a potential threat to them and loan them out
to a team from a league as far removed from their own as possible.
A
lot of money appears to have changed hands but it is hard to see that
any Premier League side has greatly strengthened their squad. I would
love someone to explain what is going on at Southampton. Having
overachieved last year they have sold the backbone of the team and
consequently find themselves favourites for the drop this season.
Liverpool have splashed the cash in the expectation of a run in the
Champions League, Manchester United, Manchester City,Tottenham,
Arsenal and Everton seem to be chasing every player with a world cup
pedigree who is unsettled or only has a year left on their contract.
The
fact so many of the top clubs have been looking to offload some of
their fringe or surplus players (and largely failing) would indicate
how the market has been driven by over-priced prima donnas. The
number of clubs competing for the top players is increasing as the
game increases it global foothold. Transfer fees may continue to rise
but you really have to question what you are getting for your money.
Are
the likes of Messi, Ronaldo, Bale really worth £80m? Eyebrows were
raised when Torres was sold to Chelsea for £50m. Given some of the
fees paid of late it is a wonder eyes have not popped out of their
sockets.
This
time last season I was warming to the transfer of Mehmet Ozil to
Arsenal for £42m as shrewd business (the sight of Wenger opening his
wallet always raises an eyebrow). Up until Christmas he looked like a
man on a mission, since then he looks like a man who has gone
missing. A world class player who has lost the 'cl'. Players with the
talent of a Torres or an Ozil do not lose their ability overnight,
all players go through bad spells, but usually the confidence
returns and they bounce back. With the pressures of the game today
and the money being spent on the top performing players it remains to
be seen how long clubs will wait for players to re-discover their
form once it has deserted them.
No
sooner has Liverpool's Bad Boy, Luis Suarez, left these shores than
they replace him with another bad boy, Mario Balotelli. He might be
good for the telly, not so sure what damage he might bring to the
dressing-room. And, in what appears to have a whiff of desperation
Manchester United have forked out nearly £60m for Argentine winger,
Angel Di Maria, taking their spending in the past 2 years to over
£200m. Personally, I did not think that Di Maria had a particularly
great world cup. Yes, he has a certain talent but I feel his
valuation has been boosted by the unavailability of many of the other
top players.
Not
sure what was going through Arsene Wenger's mind when he allowed Cesc
Fabregas to move to Chelsea for £27m. Maybe Arsenal do have a
surfeit of midfielders on the payroll but most of them have season
tickets for the treatment room, none are natural leaders and allowing
a player of his class to go to one of your main competitors, when you
have 1st option would seem contrary to what most other
clubs would have done.
Clearly
the Summer sun has gone to some of the manager's heads, or is it just
the heat of the battle.